I was going along the BBC "HaveYour Say Forums" and I found this topic. Many of the people seem to support it because Saddam was a madman and Israel had the right to self-defense. This was my comment:
Israel has an even worse track record in terms of UN resolution violation by a much greater number. If one believes that bombing the reactor in Iraq was justified, then it necessarily follows that bombing any Israeli reactor is justified. In such an unstable region, nuclear weapson [sic] combined with human error are more likely to end in disaster. It is necessary to have a nuclear free ME. If Israel needs to defend itself, then it has a very powerful conventional army.
What do you guys think?
P.S. Someone called me an "armchair critic" for this post.